Performance summary based on published UK Housing Ombudsman determinations. Figures reflect
only complaints that reached a formal determination and are not a complete measure of service.
Key statistics
Decisions
3
Published determinations
Maladministration rate
67%
Decisions with an adverse finding
Severe maladministration
0
Most serious findings
Compensation ordered
£800
Total across decisions
Adverse findings
2
Decisions against
Outcome breakdown
Count of outcomes reached across complaint heads in 3
published decisions.
No maladministration1
Service failure2
Maladministration1
Ashfield District Council's maladministration rate (67%) is lower than the average for local authority / almo / tmo (71%) across published Ombudsman determinations.
The Ombudsman found maladministration in the landlord's response to reports of antisocial behaviour, due to delays in the actions it took and in its communication, and poor record keeping, causing distress, worry, time…
The Ombudsman found service failure by Ashfield District Council in its handling of a former secure tenant's rent arrears. The landlord failed to consider the resident's known vulnerabilities, did not follow up after…
The Ombudsman found no maladministration by the landlord in its response to the resident's concerns about the boundary hedge, which had been cut low before her tenancy began. The landlord explained its position, planted…
Landlord Monitor tracks your organisation's record, benchmarks you against peers and sends early-warning alerts the moment a new determination is published.
We use privacy-friendly analytics.
With your consent we set a Google Analytics cookie to understand how the site is used.
No advertising or cross-site tracking. You can change your mind any time.