Performance summary based on published UK Housing Ombudsman determinations. Figures reflect
only complaints that reached a formal determination and are not a complete measure of service.
Key statistics
Decisions
3
Published determinations
Maladministration rate
67%
Decisions with an adverse finding
Severe maladministration
0
Most serious findings
Compensation ordered
£150
Total across decisions
Adverse findings
2
Decisions against
Outcome breakdown
Count of outcomes reached across complaint heads in 3
published decisions.
No maladministration2
Service failure2
Outside jurisdiction1
Cannock Chase District Council's maladministration rate (67%) is lower than the average for local authority / almo / tmo (71%) across published Ombudsman determinations.
The Ombudsman determined the complaint about intimidation by a rent collection officer was outside its jurisdiction, as the matter could have been and was raised as part of the landlord's court possession proceedings.
The Ombudsman found no maladministration in the landlord's response to ASB reports and counter-allegations, as it properly investigated the neighbour's report and offered mediation. However, there was service failure in…
The Ombudsman found no maladministration in the landlord's response to reports of a dark patch on the exterior of the resident's property, as it was a cosmetic issue and the landlord later agreed to clean it. However,…
Monitor Cannock Chase District Council and its peers
Landlord Monitor tracks your organisation's record, benchmarks you against peers and sends early-warning alerts the moment a new determination is published.
We use privacy-friendly analytics.
With your consent we set a Google Analytics cookie to understand how the site is used.
No advertising or cross-site tracking. You can change your mind any time.