Performance summary based on published UK Housing Ombudsman determinations. Figures reflect
only complaints that reached a formal determination and are not a complete measure of service.
Key statistics
Decisions
4
Published determinations
Maladministration rate
50%
Decisions with an adverse finding
Severe maladministration
0
Most serious findings
Compensation ordered
£700
Total across decisions
Adverse findings
2
Decisions against
Outcome breakdown
Count of outcomes reached across complaint heads in 4
published decisions.
Reasonable redress2
Service failure1
Maladministration1
East Suffolk Council's maladministration rate (50%) is lower than the average for local authority / almo / tmo (71%) across published Ombudsman determinations.
The Ombudsman found maladministration in the landlord's response to the resident's reports of damp and mould. Although its initial inspections were timely, the landlord failed to act on recorded high humidity levels,…
The Ombudsman found that the landlord's handling of a cooker socket repair, completed within its urgent repair timescale, and its £25 compensation offer for its initial error constituted reasonable redress.
The landlord's contractor cancelled an appointment to replace the resident's radiators due to a procedural error. The Ombudsman found service failure but determined the landlord had offered reasonable redress before…
The landlord was found to have service failure for delays in replacing blown windows at the property and poor communication. It acknowledged the windows should have been replaced before the resident moved in but took 42…
Landlord Monitor tracks your organisation's record, benchmarks you against peers and sends early-warning alerts the moment a new determination is published.
We use privacy-friendly analytics.
With your consent we set a Google Analytics cookie to understand how the site is used.
No advertising or cross-site tracking. You can change your mind any time.