Performance summary based on published UK Housing Ombudsman determinations. Figures reflect
only complaints that reached a formal determination and are not a complete measure of service.
Key statistics
Decisions
4
Published determinations
Maladministration rate
100%
Decisions with an adverse finding
Severe maladministration
0
Most serious findings
Compensation ordered
£2,150
Total across decisions
Adverse findings
4
Decisions against
Outcome breakdown
Count of outcomes reached across complaint heads in 4
published decisions.
No maladministration2
Service failure3
Maladministration3
Outside jurisdiction1
Fairhive Homes Limited's maladministration rate (100%) is higher than the average for local authority / almo / tmo (71%) across published Ombudsman determinations.
The disrepair claim was outside jurisdiction as it had been subject to court proceedings. No maladministration was found in the landlord's handling of boxing-in of exposed pipework. Service failure was found regarding…
The Ombudsman found service failure in the landlord's handling of the resident's rehousing request, as it did not keep her up to date or manage her expectations while waiting for a suitable larger property. It also…
The Ombudsman found service failure in the landlord's handling of repairs to the rear extension (it failed to identify the unauthorised extension and the resident's repair responsibilities at mutual exchange) and in its…
The Ombudsman found maladministration in the landlord's handling of reports of noise nuisance from the communal entrance door, its handling of reports of a silverfish infestation, and its complaint handling. The…
Landlord Monitor tracks your organisation's record, benchmarks you against peers and sends early-warning alerts the moment a new determination is published.
We use privacy-friendly analytics.
With your consent we set a Google Analytics cookie to understand how the site is used.
No advertising or cross-site tracking. You can change your mind any time.