Performance summary based on published UK Housing Ombudsman determinations. Figures reflect
only complaints that reached a formal determination and are not a complete measure of service.
Key statistics
Decisions
4
Published determinations
Maladministration rate
75%
Decisions with an adverse finding
Severe maladministration
1
Most serious findings
Compensation ordered
£800
Total across decisions
Adverse findings
3
Decisions against
Outcome breakdown
Count of outcomes reached across complaint heads in 4
published decisions.
No maladministration2
Reasonable redress1
Service failure1
Maladministration4
Severe maladministration1
Lancaster City Council's maladministration rate (75%) is lower than the average for local authority / almo / tmo (83%) across published Ombudsman determinations.
The Ombudsman found reasonable redress by the landlord in its handling of the resident's reports of damp and mould, noting it acted within policy timescales, acknowledged a failing in following up on fogging, apologised…
Maladministration was found in the landlord's response to the resident's reports of damp and mould due to unreasonable delays in follow-on works and installation of a storage heater and extractor fan, and failure to…
The Ombudsman found service failure, no maladministration, severe maladministration, maladministration in the landlord’s handling of the landlord’s response to the resident’s request for a new staircase. The Ombudsman…
The Ombudsman found maladministration in the landlord’s handling of the landlord’s handling of the resident’s reports of antisocial behaviour (ASB). The Ombudsman has also investigated the landlord’s complaint handling..
Landlord Monitor tracks your organisation's record, benchmarks you against peers and sends early-warning alerts the moment a new determination is published.
We use privacy-friendly analytics.
With your consent we set a Google Analytics cookie to understand how the site is used.
No advertising or cross-site tracking. You can change your mind any time.