Performance summary based on published UK Housing Ombudsman determinations. Figures reflect
only complaints that reached a formal determination and are not a complete measure of service.
Key statistics
Decisions
4
Published determinations
Maladministration rate
50%
Decisions with an adverse finding
Severe maladministration
0
Most serious findings
Compensation ordered
£400
Total across decisions
Adverse findings
2
Decisions against
Outcome breakdown
Count of outcomes reached across complaint heads in 4
published decisions.
No maladministration2
Reasonable redress2
Service failure2
Outside jurisdiction1
Moat Housing Group Limited's maladministration rate (50%) is lower than the average for housing association (64%) across published Ombudsman determinations.
The landlord made reasonable redress for its handling of the replacement fence, where it changed the agreed plan to half width panels without informing the resident, offering £50 compensation which the Ombudsman found…
The Ombudsman found service failure by Moat Housing Group in its handling of a service charge information request, its continued contact with the resident's appointee after consent was withdrawn, and its complaint…
The Ombudsman found reasonable redress by the landlord for its service failure in responding to repair works to the threshold of the resident's patio door. The landlord acknowledged delays and communication failings,…
The Ombudsman found no maladministration by Moat Housing Group in its response to the resident's concerns about administration of the rent account. The landlord had appropriately responded to queries about accounting…
Landlord Monitor tracks your organisation's record, benchmarks you against peers and sends early-warning alerts the moment a new determination is published.
We use privacy-friendly analytics.
With your consent we set a Google Analytics cookie to understand how the site is used.
No advertising or cross-site tracking. You can change your mind any time.