Landlord Record

Gentoo Sunderland Ltd · Case 202108681 · 13 December 2021

Gentoo Sunderland Ltd — case 202108681

Maladministration

The Ombudsman found maladministration in the landlord’s handling of REPORT COMPLAINT 202108681 Gentoo Sunderland Ltd 13 December 2021 Our approach What we can and cannot consider is called the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction and is governed by the Housing Ombudsman Scheme. T.

The full determination

REPORT COMPLAINT 202108681 Gentoo Sunderland Ltd 13 December 2021 Our approach What we can and cannot consider is called the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction and is governed by the Housing Ombudsman Scheme. The Ombudsman must determine whether a complaint comes within their jurisdiction. The Ombudsman seeks to resolve disputes wherever possible but cannot investigate complaints that fall outside of this. In deciding whether a complaint falls within their jurisdiction, the Ombudsman will carefully consider all the evidence provided by the parties and the circumstances of the case.

The complaint The complaint is about the level of rent at the property. Determination (jurisdictional decision) When a complaint is brought to the Ombudsman, we must consider all the circumstances of the case as there are sometimes reasons why a complaint will not be investigated. After carefully considering all the evidence, I have determined that the complaint, as set out above, is not within the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction. Summary of events The resident is a tenant of the landlord.

The resident raised a complaint to the landlord that the level of rent at their property was too high. The resident explained that they understood that nearby properties were rented out at a substantially lower amount than the rent set for their property. The landlord issued their final response on 8 July 2021. The landlord explained that the resident occupies a property with a market rent, which is set higher than social or affordable rent properties. The landlord acknowledged that other properties in the area are rented at social or affordable rents and would therefore be cheaper.

It was satisfied that, at the time the resident’s occupation of the property commenced and the tenancy agreement signed, that the rent was set correctly. The Ombudsman was provided with a copy of the final response on 10 August 2021. In their contact with service, the resident explained that their complaint concerns the level of rent which they think is too high compared to other properties in the area. Reasons Paragraph 39(g) of the Scheme states that: ‘The Ombudsman will not investigate complaints which: concern the level of rent or service charge or the amount of the rent or service charge increase’ The resident’s confirmed that the complaint concerns their level of rent, which they consider too high.

As set out in paragraph 39 (g) of the Housing Ombudsman Scheme, this Service cannot consider complaints about the level of rent. If the resident remains dissatisfied with this matter, they may wish to seek further assistance from Shelter or Citizens Advice. www.shelter.org.uk www.citizensadvice.org.

This is a structured summary of a published determination. The official decision is the authoritative record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Similar decisions

Other determinations involving Gentoo Sunderland Ltd or the same complaint category.

London Borough of Islington

202448147 Local authority / ALMO / TMO

£125

The Ombudsman found no maladministration, reasonable redress, severe maladministration, maladministration, mediation settlement in the landlord’s handling of the landlord’s response to the resident’s: Reports of noise…

No maladministration Reasonable redress Severe maladministration Maladministration Mediation / settlement complaint handling delay asb record keeping communication failure

London & Quadrant Housing Trust

202517130 Housing association

The Ombudsman found maladministration, service failure, severe maladministration, reasonable redress, mediation settlement in the landlord’s handling of the landlord’s handling of repairs after a burst pipe. We have…

Maladministration Service failure Severe maladministration Reasonable redress Mediation / settlement damp and mould leak water ingress complaint handling delay repairs delay

London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham

202316026 Local authority / ALMO / TMO

The Ombudsman found service failure, severe maladministration, maladministration, outside jurisdiction in the landlord’s handling of how the landlord handled the resident’s: Reports of a leak, decorative damage, and a…

Service failure Severe maladministration Maladministration Outside jurisdiction damp and mould leak water ingress complaint handling delay repairs delay