Islington and Shoreditch Housing Association Limited · Case 202528032 · 29 April 2026
Islington and Shoreditch Housing Association Limited — case 202528032
The Ombudsman found service failure in the landlord's communication with the resident, including a failure to give notice of scaffolding erection and delays in responding to her concerns. The landlord was ordered to pay £75 for the distress and inconvenience caused.
The full determination
Decision Case ID 202528032 Decision type Investigation Landlord Islington and Shoreditch Housing Association Limited Landlord type Housing Association Occupancy Assured Tenancy Date 29 April 2026 Background On 19 August 2025, the resident complained to the landlord about its communication. She explained: A surveyor had attended in February 2025 in relation to external works and she had not received an update. It failed to notify her that the recently installed scaffolding was going to be erected.
On 6 August 2025 she emailed her housing officer with her concerns about potential sub-letting and other matters which had not been responded to. What the complaint is about The complaint is about the landlord’s communication with the resident. Our decision (determination) There was service failure in the landlord’s communication with the resident. We have made orders for the landlord to put things right. Reasons Landlords should respond to their residents within a reasonable timeframe to ensure their enquiries are promptly answered and resolved.
The landlord’s cyclical decorations and repairs procedure says that it gives residents “at least seven days’ notice if scaffolding needs to be erected” in order to carry out works. In its stage 1 response, the landlord upheld the resident’s complaint about its communication. It acknowledged the failings that she had raised and apologised. It also provided an update on the external works. This was positive. However, the resident incurred frustration and inconvenience due to the landlord’s lack of communication.
She also incurred time and trouble as she had to raise a complaint to receive a response from the landlord. Therefore, it would have been reasonable for the landlord to have considered compensation. In addition, following the landlord’s stage 1 response, there were further communication issues relating to the resident’s stage 1 complaint concerns. The resident’s new housing officer did not email her about her concerns until 10 September 2025 and the surveyor did not contact her until 5 September 2025.
The landlord acknowledged the additional failings within its stage 2 response and apologised again. While noted, the apology did not go far enough to put matters right. This is because the resident incurred additional frustration, time, trouble and inconvenience due to the further issues and having to escalate her complaint about them. Given the landlord’s failings, we have ordered it to pay the resident £75 in recognition of the time, trouble and inconvenience caused. This is in line with our compensation guidance.
Putting things right Where we find service failure, maladministration or severe maladministration we can make orders for the landlord to put things right. We have the discretion to make recommendations in all other cases within our jurisdiction. Orders Landlords must comply with our orders in the manner and timescales we specify. The landlord must provide documentary evidence of compliance with our orders by the due date set. Order What the landlord must do Due date 1 Compensation order The landlord must pay the resident £75 for the distress and inconvenience caused by its poor communication.
This must be paid directly to the resident by the due date. The landlord must provide documentary evidence of payment by the due date. No later than 27 May 2026 Recommendations Our recommendations are not binding, and a landlord may decide not to follow them. Our recommendations It is recommended that, given its communication failings, the landlord may wish to complete our eLearning on communication, which it can find on the Centre for Leaning section of our website.
This is a structured summary of a published determination. The official decision is the authoritative record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.