Landlord Record

London Borough of Sutton · Case 202344167 · 21 May 2026

London Borough of Sutton — case 202344167

Outside jurisdiction

The complaint about the landlord's refusal of the succession application was found to be outside the Ombudsman's jurisdiction because the central issue of succession rights was integral to ongoing possession proceedings, where the applicant had a reasonable opportunity with legal advice to present his case.

Findings by complaint head

  • Refusal of succession application

    Outside jurisdiction

    The complaint about the landlord's refusal of the succession application is outside jurisdiction because the central issue of whether the applicant had a right to succeed was integral to ongoing possession proceedings, and the applicant had a reasonable opportunity with legal advice to present his case during that process.

The full determination

Decision Case ID 202344167 Decision type Investigation Landlord London Borough of Sutton Landlord type Local Authority Occupancy Applicant Date 21 May 2026 Background The applicant’s father was a tenant until his death in December 2023. The applicant applied to succeed to the tenancy. The landlord refused, stating he had not lived at the property for the required 12 months. The applicant later complained about this decision. What the complaint is about The complaint is about the landlord’s decision to refuse the succession application.

Our decision (determination) We have found that the complaint about the landlord’s decision to refuse the succession application is outside our jurisdiction to investigate. Reasons After the applicant’s complaint, the landlord served a notice to quit on the applicant to vacate the property. The applicant has told us that there is a current court case. The evidence from the landlord also shows reference to an ongoing court case. We may not investigate matters where an applicant has had (or will have) the chance to raise the subject matter of the complaint as part of legal proceedings.

In this case, the applicant’s solicitor made an offer to the landlord on 16 April 2026. This offer included the landlord obtaining possession of the property in 30 days. In this case, the central issue – whether the applicant had a right to succeed – was integral to the possession proceedings and formed part of the solicitor’s offer. The applicant therefore had a reasonable opportunity, with legal advice, to present his case and challenge the landlord’s position on succession during that process.

For this reason, we will not investigate the complaint about the landlord’s refusal of the succession application.

This is a structured summary of a published determination. The official decision is the authoritative record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Similar decisions

Other determinations involving London Borough of Sutton or the same complaint category.