Landlord Record

Peabody Trust · Case 202007376 · 19 January 2021

Peabody Trust — case 202007376

Outside jurisdiction

The Ombudsman determined that the complaint about the landlord's handling of a heating disrepair issue was outside its jurisdiction because legal proceedings had been initiated by the resident on the same matter, in line with Paragraph 39(h) of the Scheme.

Findings by complaint head

Summarised automatically from the decision below. The Ombudsman's decision text is the authoritative record.

  • Jurisdiction – heating disrepair complaint

    Outside jurisdiction

    The complaint concerns the landlord's handling of a heating disrepair issue. Both parties confirmed that legal proceedings had been initiated regarding the same matter. Under Paragraph 39(h) of the Housing Ombudsman Scheme, the Ombudsman will not investigate complaints that are or have been the subject of legal proceedings where the complainant had the opportunity to raise the matter in those proceedings. Therefore the complaint is outside the Ombudsman's jurisdiction.

The full determination

REPORT COMPLAINT 202007376 Peabody Trust 19 January 2021 Our approach What we can and cannot consider is called the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction and is governed by the Housing Ombudsman Scheme. The Ombudsman must determine whether a complaint comes within their jurisdiction. The Ombudsman seeks to resolve disputes wherever possible but cannot investigate complaints that fall outside of this. In deciding whether a complaint falls within their jurisdiction, the Ombudsman will carefully consider all the evidence provided by the parties and the circumstances of the case.

The complaint The complaint relates to the landlords handling of a heating dis-repair issue. Determination (jurisdictional decision) When a complaint is brought to the Ombudsman, we must consider all the circumstances of the case as there are sometimes reasons why a complaint will not be investigated. After carefully considering all the evidence, I have determined that the complaint, as set out above, is not within the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction. Summary of events On 18 October 2020, the resident contacted this Service for assistance with her complaint concerning issues with her hot water and heating.

The resident explained that the issues had been ongoing since 2019 and that although the hot water had been fixed, she remained without heating. We then wrote to the landlord requesting that it contact the resident to discuss her complaint in-line with its complaints procedure. On 20 October the landlord responded to this service to explain that the resident had initiated a legal dis-repair claim against it and stated that court proceedings had been issued. In response, our service requested evidence of this.

On the 14 November, the resident contacted our service to advise us that she would be taking legal action for disrepair. On 18 November, the landlord provided us with evidence that it had filed a defence to a counterclaim submitted by the resident concerning disrepair at the property. Reasons Paragraph 39(h) of the Scheme states that: The Ombudsman will not investigate complaints which, in the Ombudsman’s opinion: concern matters that are, or have been, the subject of legal proceedings and where a complainant has or had the opportunity to raise the subject matter of the complaint as part of those proceedings.

As both parties have confirmed to this service that legal action has been initiated, I am satisfied that, in accordance with Paragraph 39 (h) of the Scheme, this complaint is not within the jurisdiction of the Ombudsman to consider.

This is a structured summary of a published determination. The official decision is the authoritative record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Similar decisions

Other determinations involving Peabody Trust or the same complaint category.