Clarion Housing Association Limited · Case 202504250 · 8 June 2026
Clarion Housing Association Limited — case 202504250
The resident complained that the landlord failed to answer his service charge queries and delayed providing information. The landlord acknowledged the delays, apologised and offered £150 compensation, and following the Ombudsman's intervention agreed to provide clear breakdowns of the service charges and answers to his specific queries; the Ombudsman considered this offer resolves the complaint satisfactorily.
Orders and recommendations
- Take specific actionWithin 4 weeks
Provide a clear and simplified breakdown of the resident's 2024/25 and 2025/26 service charge, including a description of each charge and how each cost applies, with clarification on the differences between communal cleaning, caretaking and grounds maintenance.
- Take specific actionWithin 4 weeks
Provide a clear breakdown of the resident's revised service charges for 2023/24 and 2024/25.
- Take specific actionWithin 4 weeks
Provide an answer to the resident's original questions about the communal tree works charge of £227.87, confirm its position, how the charges have been amended, and advise on the £20.61 monthly payment being charged.
- Take specific actionWithin 4 weeks
Provide an answer to the resident's query about caretaking, including what the caretaking charge refers to and how it differs from grounds maintenance.
- Take specific actionWithin 4 weeks
Provide a response to the resident's queries about the 15% admin fee, including why the admin charge is higher for 2024/25 than 2023/24.
- Take specific actionWithin 4 weeks
Provide evidence that it has carried out the services paid for under each charge on the service charge breakdown, and explain the difference between the caretaking, communal cleaning and grounds maintenance charges and why there is not only one singular charge.
Findings by complaint head
Summarised automatically from the decision below. The Ombudsman's decision text is the authoritative record.
-
Handling of service charge queries and information provided
Reasonable redressThe landlord acknowledged delays in providing the information requested, provided some answers, apologised and offered £150 compensation. Following the Ombudsman's intervention, the landlord agreed to provide clear and simplified breakdowns of the 2024/25 and 2025/26 service charges, revised charges for 2023/24 and 2024/25, answers to queries about communal tree works (£227.87), caretaking, the 15% admin fee, and evidence of services carried out. The Ombudsman considered the offer of redress resolves the complaint satisfactorily.
The full determination
Decision Case ID 202504250 Decision type Investigation Landlord Clarion Housing Association Limited Landlord type Housing Association Occupancy Assured Shorthold Tenancy Date 8 June 2026 Background The resident complained that the landlord did not answer his queries about his service charges and for the delays in him getting any answers. He has said the landlord has failed to provide clarity about his service charges. As he received limited information, he escalated the matter to the Ombudsman.
What the complaint is about The complaint is about how the landlord handled the resident’s service charge queries and the information it provided. Our decision (determination) The landlord has made an offer of redress following our intervention which, in the Ombudsman’s opinion, resolves the complaint satisfactorily. We have recommended that the landlord honour the intervention agreed to put things right. Reasons During its complaints process, the landlord acknowledged that it had caused delays in providing the information the resident was requesting.
It provided some answers, apologised and offered the resident £150 compensation. The resident remained dissatisfied and raised the complaint with our service. He said the landlord had not resolved his complaint as he did not receive the information he was seeking. We contacted the landlord and provided it with a summary of our understanding of the complaint. Following our intervention, the landlord agreed to: Provide a clear and simplified breakdown of the resident’s 2024/25 and 2025/26 service charge.
This breakdown should include a description of each charge and explain how each cost applies. This should include clarification on the differences between communal cleaning, caretaking and grounds maintenance. Provide a clear breakdown of the resident’s revised service charges for 2023/24 and for 2024/25. Provide an answer to the resident’s original questions about the communal tree works for service charges for £227.87. He noted the landlord had removed the cost of this for 2023/24 but asked why this had not been reflected in his revised charges for 2024/25 The landlord has agreed to confirm its position on this, confirm how the charges have been amended and advise on the £20.
61 monthly payment he is currently being charged. Provide an answer to the resident’s query about caretaking, he asked what the caretaking charge refers to and how it differs from the ground maintenance. He has said there is no grass, flowerbeds or communal garden areas. Provide a response to the resident’s queries about the 15% admin fee. He has asked why the admin charge is higher for 2024/25 than 2023/24. Provide evidence that it has carried out the services he has paid for each charge on his service charge breakdown.
Explain the difference between the caretaking, communal cleaning and grounds maintenance charges and why there is not only one singular charge. Putting things right Recommendations The complaint has been resolved with intervention on the basis that the landlord follows our recommendations within 4 weeks of the date of this decision. Our recommendations As agreed, the landlord should: Provide a clear and simplified breakdown of the resident’s 2024/25 and 2025/26 service charge.
This breakdown should include a description of each charge and explain how each cost applies. This should include clarification on the differences between communal cleaning, caretaking and grounds maintenance. Provide a clear breakdown of the resident’s revised service charges for 2023/24 and for 2024/25. Provide an answer to the resident’s original questions about the communal tree works for service charges for £227.87. He noted the landlord had removed the cost of this for 2023/24 but asked why this had not been reflected in his revised charges for 2024/25 The landlord has agreed to confirm its position on this, confirm how the charges have been amended and advise on the £20.
61 monthly payment he is currently being charged. Provide an answer to the resident’s query about caretaking, he asked what the caretaking charge refers to and how it differs from the ground maintenance. He has said there are no grass, flowerbeds or communal garden areas. Provide a response to the resident’s queries about the 15% admin fee. He has asked why the admin charge is higher for 2024/25 than 2023/24. Provide evidence that it has carried out the services he has paid for each charge on his service charge breakdown.
Explain the difference between the caretaking, communal cleaning and grounds maintenance charges and why there is not only one singular charge.
This is a structured summary of a published determination. The official decision is the authoritative record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.