Landlord Record

Places for People Group Limited · Case 202442863 · 12 February 2026

Places for People Group Limited — case 202442863

Maladministration

The Ombudsman found maladministration regarding the landlord's decision to change the cleaning service and its handling of the resident's information request about service charge costs. The landlord failed to demonstrate due regard to the Section 20 consultation obligation and did not provide sufficient information to justify the service charge overspend. Orders were made for the landlord to provide the requested information and pay £200 compensation.

Orders and recommendations

  • Take specific action

    Provide the summary of costs and subsequently access to all supporting documents including accounts, receipts, invoices, contracts and any other documents relevant to the costs shown in the summary. Explain in writing whether the cleaning contract was subject to the consultation requirement.

  • Compensation

    Pay the resident £200 in recognition of the distress and inconvenience caused by the failures identified.

Compensation ordered

Reason Amount
Distress and inconvenience caused by the failures identified £200
Total £200

Findings by complaint head

  • Decision to change the cleaning service

    Maladministration

    The landlord failed to demonstrate due regard to the Section 20 consultation obligation under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 when changing the cleaning contractor, and could not clarify the terms of the cleaning contract or whether it was exempt from consultation.

  • Handling of the information requested

    Maladministration

    The landlord did not demonstrate that the resident was supplied with sufficient information to understand the service charge costs, and did not show that the information shared was satisfactory when the resident requested a forensic breakdown of the account deficit.

The full determination

Decision Case ID 202442863 Decision type Investigation Landlord Places for People Group Limited Landlord type Housing Association Occupancy Leaseholder Date 12 February 2026 Background In September 2024, the landlord sent the resident the actual service charge statement for the year ending March 2024. The statement showed £624.40 overspend, which the landlord explained was due to unforeseen repairs, health and safety expenditure and changes to its cleaning services. The resident told us that, in his opinion, the landlord’s decision to change its cleaning services was unjustified.

He said the landlord was not transparent with its service charge decision, and he would like a full breakdown of the end-of-year account to justify the overspend he was now required to pay. What the complaint is about The complaint is about the landlord’s decision to change the cleaning service and the handling of the information requested. Our decision (determination) We have found maladministration. We have made orders for the landlord to put things right. Summary of reasons In May 2023, the landlord inspected the property and noted that the cleaning standards were unsatisfactory.

This was clear in the comprehensive and timestamped estate inspection form. The lease requires the landlord to upkeep the communal areas, including cleaning and clearing the stairs and all emergency escape routes. It was therefore appropriate that it took prompt action to address this issue. Its decision to increase the cleaning frequency from fortnightly to weekly resulted in a significant improvement, as shown in the September 2023 estate inspection report. However, it remains unclear why the landlord chose to replace the cleaning contractor in October 2023.

Section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (as amended) (the ‘Act’) requires landlords to consult leaseholders when entering into a qualifying long-term agreement lasting longer than a year, for which the leaseholder would be expected to contribute £100 or more per year. It appears that these requirements were met in this case, as the new contractor carried out the cleaning in October 2023 and was replaced in November 2024. The overall expenditure for the resident was greater than £100.

In the absence of consultation, the Act caps the annual contribution at £100. The landlord was unable to clarify the terms of this cleaning contract and whether it was exempt from the consultation requirement. Consequently, we have seen no evidence that the landlord had due regard to the obligation placed on it under the Act. Moreover, the evidence provided by the landlord does not demonstrate that the resident was supplied with sufficient information to understand the costs.

The resident was entitled to review the evidence of spending for any service charges the landlord sought to recover. Therefore, soon after the resident requested a forensic breakdown of the account deficit for ‘Maintenance and Repairs’ ‘Ground Maintenance’ ‘Health and Safety’, this should have been provided in full. We can see from the correspondence that some level of information was provided. However, the resident disputed that this was the correct information or sufficient to explain the charges in question.

The landlord has not shown us that the information shared was satisfactory. Putting things right Where we find service failure, maladministration or severe maladministration we can make orders for the landlord to put things right. We have the discretion to make recommendations in all other cases within our jurisdiction. Orders Landlords must comply with our orders in the manner and timescales we specify. The landlord must provide documentary evidence of compliance with our orders by the due date set.

Order What the landlord must do Due date 1 Provision of information order The landlord must ensure the following is provided to the resident by the due date: Provide the summary of costs and subsequently access to all supporting documents including accounts, receipts, invoices, contracts and any other documents relevant to the costs shown in the summary. Explain to the resident in writing whether the cleaning contract was subject to the consultation requirement. No later than 11 March 2026 Compensation order The landlord must pay the resident £200 in recognition of the distress and inconvenience caused by the failures identified.

This must be paid directly to the resident by the due date. The landlord must provide documentary evidence of payment by the due date.

This is a structured summary of a published determination. The official decision is the authoritative record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Similar decisions

Other determinations involving Places for People Group Limited or the same complaint category.